Author
Abstract
Flight distance reflects the risk that an individual animal is willing to take when approached by a potential predator. Because residual reproductive value is the average number of offspring that an individual of a given age class is expected to produce after the current reproductive event, individuals with low residual reproductive value should take greater risks than the average individual to make them more likely to gain at least some reproductive success. Therefore, I predicted that individuals belonging to bird species with intense infections with virulent parasites to take greater risks than individuals of species with few or no virulent parasites. In a comparative study of mean flight distance of 133 different bird species, as estimated from the distance at which individuals fled when approached by a human, relative flight distance decreased with the number of blood parasite species and the prevalence of blood parasites, as expected if parasitism reduces residual reproductive value. Birds that take great risks in terms of reduced flight distance run elevated risks of mortality by predators that are allowed to approach potential prey. However, relative flight distance decreased independently for species richness and prevalence of blood parasites and for risk of predation due to the European sparrow hawk Accipiter nisus. These findings suggest that standardized measures of flight distance provide reliable information about risk taking by individuals, with important consequences for life history, parasitism, and risk of predation. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Anders Pape Møller, 2008.
"Flight distance and blood parasites in birds,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(6), pages 1305-1313.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:1305-1313
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:1305-1313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.