IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i6p1143-1149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of competition and food availability on travel time in scatter-hoarding gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis)

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy J. Hopewell
  • Lisa A. Leaver
  • Stephen E.G. Lea

Abstract

Scatter-hoarding animals transport food away from its source before storing it to maximize the likelihood that the cache will survive for use at a later time. However, the more time animals spend transporting and storing the food the less time they have for food collection. Previous studies suggest that the time animals spend on caching depends to some extent on the availability of food and on the presence of conspecifics at the food source. We tested whether a scatter-hoarding mammal responds flexibly to conspecifics as competitors according to the availability of food or if they respond more directly to them as potential pilferers. We used multiple linear regression to model the time eastern gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) took to return to nut patches of varying quality after collecting a nut for caching when they were alone and when conspecifics were present. The results provide the first evidence that scatter hoarders respond to conspecifics at a food source primarily as competitors rather than as potential pilferers; the squirrels increased the rate at which they returned to the nut patch when conspecifics were present rather than transport the nuts farther away to minimize the risk of pilferage. In contrast, and in line with previous studies, the squirrels responded to a reduction in the availability of food by increasing the distance at which they stored the food from the source. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy J. Hopewell & Lisa A. Leaver & Stephen E.G. Lea, 2008. "Effects of competition and food availability on travel time in scatter-hoarding gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(6), pages 1143-1149.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:1143-1149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn095
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:1143-1149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.