IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i6p1128-1135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mate choice and courtship signal differentiation promotes speciation in an Amazonian frog

Author

Listed:
  • Mónica A. Guerra
  • Santiago R. Ron

Abstract

Female mate choice influences the evolution of male courtship signals and may promote speciation when those sexually selected traits also have a function in species discrimination. Here, we assess interpopulation female mate choice by conducting phonotaxis experiments on a population of the Amazonian frog Engystomops petersi in Puyo, Ecuador. Our results show very strong behavioral isolation relative to 1 of 2 foreign populations. Puyo females strongly discriminate against La Selva in favor of Puyo or Yasuní signals. In contrast, Puyo females do not discriminate against signals from Yasuní, which are similar in frequency. Behavioral isolation was stronger than expected because Puyo females were unable to recognize La Selva courtship signals as belonging to conspecific males. Overall, female mate choices are consistent with male courtship signal differentiation among populations but inconsistent with geographic or genetic distances. Simulations under a null model of undirected evolution (Brownian motion) suggest directional selection on courtship signals at La Selva. Based on our results, we hypothesize that sexual selection and/or reinforcement is driving speciation between E. petersi populations. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Mónica A. Guerra & Santiago R. Ron, 2008. "Mate choice and courtship signal differentiation promotes speciation in an Amazonian frog," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(6), pages 1128-1135.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:1128-1135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn098
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:1128-1135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.