IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i6p1111-1115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is there a cost to larval begging in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides?

Author

Listed:
  • Per T. Smiseth
  • Hannah J. Parker

Abstract

Offspring of many animals signal their nutritional needs using conspicuous begging displays. Theoretical models for the evolution of begging suggest that costly begging signals provide an evolutionarily stable resolution to parent--offspring conflict because they provide parents with honest information on offspring need. However, other models suggest that cost-free or low-cost begging can evolve because parents and offspring have overlapping interests. Empirical studies on birds provide mixed and ambiguous evidence for begging costs. Here, we examine begging costs in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides. Larval begging may incur a growth cost as in birds or an opportunity cost because larvae cannot beg for food and self-feed at the same time. We used a novel experimental design, in which we controlled begging through the presence or absence of a dead parent simultaneously as we controlled the opportunity to self-feed through the presence or absence of food. As intended, the presence of a dead parent stimulated larval begging, whereas larvae never begged when the dead parent was absent. However, the presence or absence of a dead parent had no effect on larval growth. Likewise, the interaction between the presence or absence of food and the presence or absence of a dead parent had no effect on growth. Thus, our study provides no evidence of either a growth cost or an opportunity cost of larval begging in N. vespilloides. The lack of evidence for any significant begging costs suggests that cost-free or low-cost begging could be more common than hitherto recognized. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Per T. Smiseth & Hannah J. Parker, 2008. "Is there a cost to larval begging in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(6), pages 1111-1115.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:1111-1115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn101
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kat Bebbington & Sjouke A. Kingma & Eleanor A. Fairfield & Lewis G. Spurgin & Jan Komdeur & David S. Richardson, 2017. "Consequences of sibling rivalry vary across life in a passerine bird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(2), pages 407-418.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:6:p:1111-1115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.