Author
Listed:
- Chad D. Hoefler
- Matthew H. Persons
- Ann L. Rypstra
Abstract
The costs of secondary sexual traits are crucial to our understanding of sexual selection. Although it is broadly accepted that sexual traits are indirectly or directly costly to express, few studies have quantified such costs. Thus, it is unclear if costs are evolutionarily meaningful and to what degree. Costs play a key role in viability indicator models, which assume that 1) the expression of sexual traits reduces the fitness of the trait bearer, 2) sexual trait expression is dependent on condition, and 3) the costs of sexual trait expression are borne differentially, that is, they are less for individuals in good condition. Using 2 syntopic species of wolf spiders, we addressed the importance of direct predation costs on the viability indicator mechanism. Pardosa milvina is a small wolf spider that has conspicuous male courtship behaviors in the form of front leg raises. Hogna helluo is a large species that preys on P. milvina. In laboratory experiments, we discovered that predation risk from H. helluo was higher for courting P. milvina males than noncourting males, male P. milvina manipulated to be in good condition courted at higher rates than males manipulated to be in poor condition, and males in good condition survived predation risk better than males in poor condition. Our study suggests that predation is a significant, evolutionary cost that can satisfy viability indicator mechanism assumptions. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Chad D. Hoefler & Matthew H. Persons & Ann L. Rypstra, 2008.
"Evolutionarily costly courtship displays in a wolf spider: a test of viability indicator theory,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(5), pages 974-979.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:5:p:974-979
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:5:p:974-979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.