IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i4p847-853.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex, melanic coloration, and sibling competition during the postfledging dependence period

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Vergara
  • Juan A. Fargallo

Abstract

Success in sibling competition is one of the main factors determining individual body condition in the early stages of life and consequently offspring survival and fitness. In birds, most studies on this topic have been focused on the nesting period, but sibling competition still continues during the postfledging period. We studied sibling competition over 3 years during the postfledgling dependence period in the Eurasian kestrel Falco tinnunculus, a reversed sexually size dimorphic species. Contrary to that in the nesting stage, male fledglings showed a higher competitive capacity than females resulting from their greater success in capturing larger prey items delivered by parents. Furthermore, male fledglings showing grayer coloration in the rump captured greater number of larger prey than browner males. Our results suggest that patterns of sibling competition in nestlings can differ from those found during postfledging, revealing the importance of studying this period in order to achieve a more complete view of sibling competition. In addition, kestrel fledglings with grayer rumps were more likely to have larger prey items, suggesting that this character can be interpreted as a phenotypic indicator of quality. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Vergara & Juan A. Fargallo, 2008. "Sex, melanic coloration, and sibling competition during the postfledging dependence period," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(4), pages 847-853.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:4:p:847-853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn035
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:4:p:847-853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.