Author
Listed:
- K. A. Stiver
- J. L. Fitzpatrick
- J. K. Desjardins
- B. D. Neff
- J. S. Quinn
- S. Balshine
Abstract
Breeding with relatives can have severe fitness consequences, so avoiding these costs is often evolutionarily favored. There are a number of mechanisms that reduce the likelihood of mating with relatives, including avoiding relatives as mates (through sex-biased dispersal and mate choice) and delayed sexual maturity in the presence of relatives. Here, we examine these mechanisms in Neolamprologus pulcher, a group-living cichlid fish that exhibits male-biased dispersal. Despite sex-biased dispersal in this species, mean relatedness between social mates was not different from that expected if pairs had formed randomly, suggesting individuals neither actively avoid nor prefer pairing with relatives. Furthermore, gonadal investment of subordinates living in social groups was not correlated with their relatedness to the opposite-sex dominant breeder in the group, suggesting that sexual maturation does not depend on the presence or absence of a relative. Highly related social pairs showed higher rates of within-pair aggression and lower rates of nonaggressive social affiliation than less-related social pairs. Breeder investment and indicators of female breeder and group quality were not correlated with relatedness values between social mates. However, scraping rates (a potential quality indicator) were lower in males paired with more closely related females. We consider whether the apparent lack of inbreeding avoidance reflects an evolutionary history of limited breeding opportunities in N. pulcher or a facultative strategy of more-fit individuals and discuss the behavioral results in light of the suggested nonassortative mating with regard to relatedness. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
K. A. Stiver & J. L. Fitzpatrick & J. K. Desjardins & B. D. Neff & J. S. Quinn & S. Balshine, 2008.
"The role of genetic relatedness among social mates in a cooperative breeder,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(4), pages 816-823.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:4:p:816-823
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:4:p:816-823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.