Author
Listed:
- Vikram K. Iyengar
- Bianca D. Starks
Abstract
Spatial distribution can be affected by sexual selection, particularly in mating systems where males have exaggerated traits used to compete for access to females. Although it is rare to be able to disentangle selection arising from male competition versus female choice in such mating systems, we here report experiments in which we manipulated group size and sex ratio to determine the relative roles of males and females in a harem polygyny. Megalorchestia californiana is an amphipod (family Talitridae) that is sexually dimorphic--males are not only larger than females but also possess enlarged red antennae and gnathopods that are used to hold and guard females prior to mating inside their burrows. We conducted 2 main types of experiments: 1) we varied the mobility of 3 amphipods (2M/1F) to determine the relative roles of male competition and female choice and 2) we monitored groups of 9 or more individuals to determine how intersexual and intrasexual interactions affect overall spatial distribution. In our 3-amphipod tests, we found that male competition was more important than female choice in explaining burrow preferences. Our large group experiments, however, indicated that females also play an active role in mate selection, as females settled in random locations in single-sex groups, whereas females clustered around larger males in mixed-sex groups. Finally, we found that male body mass was correlated with the length and redness of the antennae, which suggests that males may signal their quality through visual communication. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Vikram K. Iyengar & Bianca D. Starks, 2008.
"Sexual selection in harems: male competition plays a larger role than female choice in an amphipod,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(3), pages 642-649.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:3:p:642-649
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:3:p:642-649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.