Author
Listed:
- Marc Théry
- Sylvain Pincebourde
- François Feer
Abstract
Variation of visual signal coloration has been predicted among closely related species or populations by the sensory drive hypothesis and tested in fishes, reptiles, or birds. However, despite the tremendous diversity of insect colorations and habitat preferences, sensory drive constrained by habitat transmission through different light environments has not been investigated in this group. Here, we study in a strictly crepuscular horned beetle (Coprophanaeus lancifer) the relationship between body coloration, ambient light spectra, and conspicuousness to conspecifics. We estimate brightness contrast of the mean coloration, as it is seen at relatively long distance, and color contrast of the horn seen in front of the pronotum, as it is seen during interindividual contests occurring at short distance, using a physiological model of crepuscular horned beetle vision. As predicted, brightness contrast of the mean coloration is optimal in the dusk ambient light spectrum compared with diurnal light environments. Similarly, color contrast of the horn seen in front of the pronotum is maximal in dusk light compared with other forest light environments. Dusk light favors both chromatic and achromatic detection of C. lancifer by conspecifics, which is critical for pair formation during this restricted time window. We created varying reflectance spectra and calculated their conspicuousness under different light environments: maximal color contrast is obtained for the combination beetle signal--dusk light environment. This quantitative example of adaptation of body coloration to ambient light spectrum is the first insight into sensory drive through habitat-mediated transmission of a color signal in an insect species. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Marc Théry & Sylvain Pincebourde & François Feer, 2008.
"Dusk light environment optimizes visual perception of conspecifics in a crepuscular horned beetle,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(3), pages 627-634.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:3:p:627-634
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:3:p:627-634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.