Author
Listed:
- Jouni Sorvari
- Pascal Theodora
- Stefano Turillazzi
- Harri Hakkarainen
- Liselotte Sundström
Abstract
Animals such as social insects that live in colonies can recognize intruders from other colonies of the same or different species using colony-specific odors. Such colony odors usually have both a genetic and an environmental origin. When within-colony relatedness is high (i.e., one or very few reproductive queens), colonies comprise genetically distinct entities, and recognition based on genetic cues is reliable. However, when nests contain multiple queens and colonies comprise multiple nests (polydomy), the use of purely genetically determined recognition labels may become impractical. This is due to high within-colony genetic heterogeneity and low between-colony genetic heterogeneity. This may favor the use of environmentally determined recognition labels. However, because nests within polydomous colonies may differ in their microenvironment, the use of environmental labels may also be impractical unless they are actively mixed among the nests. Using a laboratory experiment, we found that both isolation per se and diet composition influenced the cuticular chemical profiles in workers of Formica aquilonia. In addition, the level of aggression increased when both the proportions of dietary ingredients and the availability of food were altered. This suggests that increased aggression was mediated by changes in the chemical profile and that environmental cues can mediate recognition between colonies. These results also suggest that the underlying recognition cues are mutable in response to extrinsic factors such as the amount and the composition of food. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Jouni Sorvari & Pascal Theodora & Stefano Turillazzi & Harri Hakkarainen & Liselotte Sundström, 2008.
"Food resources, chemical signaling, and nest mate recognition in the ant Formica aquilonia,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(2), pages 441-447.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:2:p:441-447
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:2:p:441-447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.