IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i2p433-440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paternity costs from polyandry compensated by increased fecundity in the hide beetle

Author

Listed:
  • Kathryn B. McNamara
  • Rachael L. Brown
  • Mark A. Elgar
  • Therésa M. Jones

Abstract

Polyandry-induced sperm competition is assumed to impose costs on males through reduced per capita paternity success. In contrast, studies focusing on the consequences of polyandry for females report increased oviposition rates and fertility. For these species, there is potential for the increased female fecundity associated with polyandry to offset the costs to males of shared paternity. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the proportion and number of offspring sired by males mated with monandrous and polyandrous females in the hide beetle, Dermestes maculates, both for males mating with different females and for males remating with the same female. In 4 mating treatments, monandrous females mated either once or twice with the same male and polyandrous females mated either twice with 2 different males or thrice with 2 males (where 1 male mated twice). Polyandrous and twice-mating monandrous females displayed greater fecundity and fertility than singly mating monandrous females. Moreover, males remated to the same female had greater paternity regardless of whether that female mated with another male. In both polyandrous treatments, male mating order did not affect paternity success. Finally, although the proportion of eggs sired decreased if a male mated with a polyandrous female, multiply mating females or females that remated with a previous mate laid significantly more eggs and thus the actual number of eggs sired was comparable. Thus, males do not necessarily accrue a net fitness loss when mating with polyandrous females. This may explain the absence of any obvious defensive paternity-protection traits in hide beetles and other species. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathryn B. McNamara & Rachael L. Brown & Mark A. Elgar & Therésa M. Jones, 2008. "Paternity costs from polyandry compensated by increased fecundity in the hide beetle," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(2), pages 433-440.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:2:p:433-440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm153
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Takashi Yamane & Takahisa Miyatake, 2012. "Evolutionary correlation between male substances and female remating frequency in a seed beetle," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 715-722.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:2:p:433-440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.