IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i2p353-361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monogamy when there is potential for polygyny: tests of multiple hypotheses in a group-living fish

Author

Listed:
  • Marian Y. L. Wong
  • Philip L. Munday
  • Peter M. Buston
  • Geoffrey P. Jones

Abstract

Monogamy within social groups where there exists a high potential for polygyny poses a challenge to our understanding of mating system evolution. Specifically, the traditional explanation that monogamy evolves due to wide female dispersion, affording males little opportunity to defend multiple females, cannot apply. Instead, monogamy in groups potentially arises because females compete for breeding resources such as breeding sites, food, and paternal care. We conducted manipulative experiments to determine whether females compete over limiting resources within groups of the obligate coral-dwelling goby, Paragobiodon xanthosomus (Gobiidae). Breeding females behaved aggressively toward individuals of their own sex and evicted subordinate females that were large and mature from the group. Experimental removal of nest sites caused breeding partners to breed in alternative nest sites, demonstrating that nest site limitation was not the cause of female competition. Supplemental feeding resulted in an increase in the fecundity of breeding females but no maturation of subordinate females, demonstrating that food-limited female fecundity was a likely cause of female competition. Finally, supplemental feeding of breeding pairs demonstrated that the difference in eggs hatched by fed versus unfed males was less than the difference in eggs laid by fed versus unfed females, suggesting that paternal care limitation might also drive female competition. These results suggest that competition over food and possibly paternal care selects for dominant, breeding females to suppress the maturation of subordinate females to minimize competition. Monogamy in association with group living is therefore likely to have evolved because female competition prevents males from utilizing the potential for polygyny. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Marian Y. L. Wong & Philip L. Munday & Peter M. Buston & Geoffrey P. Jones, 2008. "Monogamy when there is potential for polygyny: tests of multiple hypotheses in a group-living fish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(2), pages 353-361.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:2:p:353-361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm141
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin L Hing & O Selma Klanten & Mark Dowton & Kylie R Brown & Marian Y L Wong, 2018. "Repeated cyclone events reveal potential causes of sociality in coral-dwelling Gobiodon fishes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:2:p:353-361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.