IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i1p67-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Waldeck
  • Malte Andersson
  • Mikael Kilpi
  • Markus Öst

Abstract

The spatial structure of relatedness between individuals in a population can be crucial for social selection and evolution. Here we analyze a female alternative reproductive tactic, conspecific brood parasitism, in relation to spatial relatedness among females in a Baltic Sea population of the common eider Somateria mollissima. The role of relatedness in brood parasitism is debated: some models predict parasite avoidance of related hosts, others predict host--parasite relatedness. We estimate pairwise relatedness from protein fingerprinting of egg albumen in 156 nests, with pairwise nest distances ranging from 1 to 6 km. Relatedness increases significantly from the longest distances to an average of r ≈ 0.09 below 20 m. Brood parasitism is common, and average pairwise relatedness between host and parasite is estimated at 0.18--0.21. Parasites thus do not avoid relatives, and combined with the findings of a similar study in another eider population, the results show that mean host--parasite relatedness is higher than that among close neighbors. High host--parasite relatedness is therefore not an effect of natal philopatry alone; some other form of kin bias is also involved. Recognition and association between birth nest mates is a candidate mechanism for further study. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Waldeck & Malte Andersson & Mikael Kilpi & Markus Öst, 2008. "Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(1), pages 67-73.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:1:p:67-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm113
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:1:p:67-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.