Author
Abstract
Conditional male mating strategies have been studied extensively in relation to male attributes, such as size and resource-holding potential, but few studies have considered the effects of environmental heterogeneity on the use of alternative mating tactics. In some systems, environmental heterogeneity may be the key to understanding the evolution and maintenance of such polyphenisms. I examined the influence of the physical environment on the use of alternative tactics by the damselfly Protoneura amatoria. Male P. amatoria reversibly use 2 tactics to gain matings: 1) sit and wait in the canopy for passing females or 2) hover over the water and attempt to grab females that are ovipositing in floating debris. Observations in 3 streams indicated that the use of the hovering tactic was greater under high-light than low-light conditions and at higher densities of ovipositing females. The density of ovipositing females was correlated with both the light conditions and the availability of oviposition substrate, indicating that physical factors exert indirect as well as direct influences on tactic use. Experimental manipulations showed that both males and females responded directly to light conditions and suggested that males responded directly to the density of ovipositing females. These results can be explained largely in terms of the cues and constraints inherent in different light environments. Thus, the conditional mating strategy of P. amatoria appears to have evolved in response to, and been maintained by, fine-scale variation in the physical environment. These findings are discussed in relation to flight dynamics and predation risk. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Brenda Larison, 2007.
"Environmental heterogeneity and alternative mating tactics in the damselfly Protoneura amatoria,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(6), pages 1021-1028.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:6:p:1021-1028
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:6:p:1021-1028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.