Author
Listed:
- Michal Polak
- Lien T. Luong
- William T. Starmer
Abstract
Research on the role of parasites in sexual selection has focused mainly on host mate choice favoring relatively unparasitized males. But parasites can also generate variance in host reproductive success by influencing the ability of individual hosts to directly compete among themselves for mates or fertilizations, a subject area that has received far less attention. We demonstrate experimentally that parasitism by mites can drive sexual selection by way of a novel mechanism involving male competition: physical inhibition of host copulation. Mite resistance in natural populations is heritable, emphasizing the evolutionary potential of parasite-mediated sexual selection in this system and indicating that females should be receiving indirect fitness benefits as a result of this process. We show that parasitism by mites, Macrocheles subbadius, reduces mating success of male Drosophila nigrospiracula. Smaller males were more strongly compromised, identifying host body size as a tolerance trait. As parasite load increased, the rate at which males attempted to copulate but failed because of obstruction by mites increased. When mites were removed from infested males, host mating success was restored. Thus, the physical presence of the mites per se generates differential mating success, in this case by interrupting the normal flow of mating behaviors. This study elucidates a potent mechanism of parasite-mediated sexual selection in a system wherein parasite resistance is demonstrably heritable, and as such expands our understanding of the evolutionary potential of sexual selection. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Michal Polak & Lien T. Luong & William T. Starmer, 2007.
"Parasites physically block host copulation: a potent mechanism of parasite-mediated sexual selection,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(5), pages 952-957.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:5:p:952-957
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:5:p:952-957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.