Author
Abstract
Sperm competition risk (SCR) models predict that if there is a low probability a male's ejaculate will compete with another male, individuals should invest less sperm in a mating, whereas if the probability of competition is high, males should invest more sperm. Alternatively, models of sperm competition intensity (SCI) predict that increased intensity of sperm competition leads to maximal sperm investment when a male faces a single competitor. Few studies have examined predictions of these models for males of varying size, and none have examined effects of sperm competition on both sperm production and expenditure. To examine effects of sperm competition on these variables, male sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) from 3 size classes were randomly assigned to one of 3 treatments that manipulated SCR and SCI: 1) no risk, low intensity; 2) risk present, medium intensity; and 3) risk present, high intensity. Male sailfin mollies produced more sperm in the high-intensity treatment than in the low-intensity treatment. Sailfin mollies in the risk present treatments expended more sperm than those males in the risk absent treatment. There was no significant difference in sperm expenditure between the medium intensity and the high-intensity treatment, indicating that maximal sperm investment does not occur when the number of competing males is one. Furthermore, small males expended more sperm than medium and large males. These results suggest that male sailfin mollies respond as predicted to SCR, but not to SCI. I suggest that male size effects and sperm production should be considered in theoretical treatments of optimal male sperm investment strategies. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Andrea S. Aspbury, 2007.
"Sperm competition effects on sperm production and expenditure in sailfin mollies, Poecilia latipinna,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(4), pages 776-780.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:4:p:776-780
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:4:p:776-780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.