IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v18y2007i4p769-775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Animal camouflage: compromise or specialize in a 2 patch-type environment?

Author

Listed:
  • Alasdair I. Houston
  • Martin Stevens
  • Innes C. Cuthill

Abstract

Many animals possess camouflage markings that reduce the risk of detection by visually hunting predators. A key aspect of camouflage involves mimicking the background against which the animal is viewed. However, most animals experience a wide variety of backgrounds and cannot change their external appearance to match each selectively. We investigate whether such animals should adopt camouflage specialized with respect to one background or adopt a compromise between the attributes of multiple backgrounds. We do this using a model consisting of predators that hunt prey in patches of 2 different types, where prey adopt the camouflage that minimizes individual risk of predation. We show that the optimal strategy of the prey is affected by a number of factors, including the relative frequencies of the patch types, the travel time of predators between patches, the mean prey number in each patch type, and the trade-off function between the levels of crypsis in the patch types. We find evidence that both specialist and compromise strategies of prey camouflage are favored under different model parameters, indicating that optimal concealment may not be as straightforward as previously thought. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Alasdair I. Houston & Martin Stevens & Innes C. Cuthill, 2007. "Animal camouflage: compromise or specialize in a 2 patch-type environment?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(4), pages 769-775.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:4:p:769-775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marina Dimitrova & Sami Merilaita, 2012. "Prey pattern regularity and background complexity affect detectability of background-matching prey," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 384-390.
    2. Elizabeth G Postema & Mia K Lippey & Tiernan Armstrong-Ingram, 2023. "Color under pressure: how multiple factors shape defensive coloration," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(1), pages 1-13.
    3. Anna E Hughes & Emmanuelle S Briolat & Lina MarĂ­a Arenas & Eric Liggins & Martin Stevens, 2023. "Varying benefits of generalist and specialist camouflage in two versus four background environments," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 426-436.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:4:p:769-775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.