Author
Listed:
- Paula M. den Hartog
- Selvino R. de Kort
- Carel ten Cate
Abstract
Secondary contact between closely related species can lead to hybridization. The fitness of hybrid individuals within and outside the hybrid zone determines whether the hybrid zone expands into the ranges of the 2 parental species or remains a stable, geographically narrow area in between the allopatric ranges of the parental species. In birds, vocalizations play an important role in male--male competition and female mate choice and are often affected by hybridization. One of the factors that will influence male hybrid fitness is the ability to defend a territory against competitors by vocalizing. We tested the efficacy of territorial signals of hybrids of 2 dove species, Streptopelia vinacea and Streptopelia capicola, compared with the vocalizations of the parental species. With playback experiments, we assessed the response to hybrid and the 2 parental species vocalizations in the hybrid zone and adjacent allopatric populations of each species. In the hybrid zone, males did not respond differently to the 3 vocalization types. In both allopatric populations, however, males responded more to conspecific than to heterospecific signals and the response strength to hybrid signals was intermediate. Therefore, in the allopatric populations, hybrid males may have a reduced success in defending territories. In male--male interactions in the hybrid zone, hybrids may not have a disadvantage compared with males of the parental species. The ability to defend a territory against competitors may thus help maintain a stable hybrid zone in the area of overlap. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Paula M. den Hartog & Selvino R. de Kort & Carel ten Cate, 2007.
"Hybrid vocalizations are effective within, but not outside, an avian hybrid zone,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(3), pages 608-614.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:3:p:608-614
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:3:p:608-614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.