IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v18y2007i2p456-459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Memory for food caches: not just for retrieval

Author

Listed:
  • Lucinda H. Male
  • Tom V. Smulders

Abstract

Many animals use hoarding as a long-term strategy to ensure a food supply at times of shortage. Hoarders employ strategies that enhance their ability to relocate caches such as remembering where caches are located. Long-term scatterhoarders, whose caches have potentially high pilferage rates, should also hoard in a way to reduce potential cache pilferers' ability to find caches. Previous studies have demonstrated that this could be achieved by hyperdispersing caches to reduce the foraging efficiency of pilferers. This study investigates whether coal tits (Parus ater) indeed place their caches away from existing ones. In our experiment, birds hoarded food in 3 conditions: when caches from a previous storage session were still present, when caches from a previous storage session were not present anymore because the bird had retrieved them, and when caches from a previous storage session had been removed by the experimenter. We show that coal tits hoard away from existing caches and that they do not use cues from extant caches to do this. This evidence is consistent with the use of memory for the locations of previous caches when deciding where to place new caches. This finding has important implications for our understanding of the selective pressures that have shaped spatial memory in food-hoarding birds. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucinda H. Male & Tom V. Smulders, 2007. "Memory for food caches: not just for retrieval," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(2), pages 456-459.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:2:p:456-459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl107
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:2:p:456-459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.