Author
Listed:
- Duncan E. Jackson
- Steven J. Martin
- Francis L. W. Ratnieks
- Mike Holcombe
Abstract
Many social insects use pheromones to communicate and coordinate their activities. Investigation of intraspecific differences in pheromone use is a new area of social insect research. For example, interindividual variation in alarm pheromone content has been found in physical castes of polymorphic ants. Many ant species use multiple trail pheromones. Here we present novel research into trail pheromone variations between behavioral subcastes of pharaoh ants, Monomorium pharaonis. Monomorium pharaonis is attracted to trail pheromones found in its poison glands (monomorines) and Dufour's glands (faranal). We show that the most abundant monomorines, I (M1) and III (M3), can be readily detected in pheromone trails. A behaviorally distinct subcaste known as "pathfinder" foragers can relocate long-lived pheromone trails. Chemical analysis showed that pathfinder foragers had low M3:M1 ratios (mean 3.09 ± 1.53, range 1.03--7.10). Nonpathfinder foragers had significantly greater M3:M1 ratios (38.3 ± 60.0, range 3.54--289). We found that M3:M1 ratio did not differ between foragers of different age but was correlated with behavioral subcaste at all ages. The relative abundance of M3:M1 on foraging trails ranged from 3.03--41.3 over time during pheromone trail build-up. M3:M1 ratio also varied spatially throughout trail networks, being lowest on trail sections closest to a food source (M3:M1 = 1.9--3.61) and highest near the nest (M3:M1 = 67--267). Our results indicate a functional role for differences in pheromone trail composition, whereby pathfinder foragers might preferentially mark sections of pheromone trail networks for future exploration. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Duncan E. Jackson & Steven J. Martin & Francis L. W. Ratnieks & Mike Holcombe, 2007.
"Spatial and temporal variation in pheromone composition of ant foraging trails,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(2), pages 444-450.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:2:p:444-450
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:2:p:444-450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.