IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v18y2007i1p121-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex-specific consequences of life in the city

Author

Listed:
  • Frances Bonier
  • Paul R. Martin
  • Kimberly S. Sheldon
  • Jay P. Jensen
  • Sarah L. Foltz
  • John C. Wingfield

Abstract

The vast majority of species are excluded from human-dominated landscapes, but some species persist and appear to thrive, despite facing challenges they would not encounter in less disturbed habitat. Corticosteroid (cort) secretion may play a significant role in enabling an animal to cope with urban breeding habitat because it helps mediate physiological and behavioral responses to environmental challenges. Here we present tests of 3 hypotheses relating to cort secretion in urban animals: 1) environmental challenges vary between urban and rural habitat, as reflected in differing levels of cort secretion in animals breeding in these habitat types, 2) there are fitness correlates associated with variation in cort levels within populations, and 3) parasite load is one of the mechanistic links between variation in cort levels and reproductive success. Male white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys) in urban habitat had significantly higher baseline corticosterone levels than males in rural habitat, whereas female Z. leucophrys' hormone levels did not differ between the 2 habitat types. To assess the fitness correlates of variation in hormone levels, we monitored seasonal reproductive success in one urban population and found that baseline corticosterone levels were predictive of female, but not male, reproductive success: females with higher corticosterone fledged fewer offspring. Data do not suggest a direct relationship between corticosterone levels and fitness and instead indicate an indirect relationship between hormone secretion, territory quality, body condition, and reproductive success. Females with blood parasites had lower heterophil:lymphocyte ratios, lower body condition scores, fewer mates, and fledged fewer offspring than females without parasites. In contrast, parasites did not negatively affect reproductive success in males but were associated with reduced body condition. Corticosterone levels did not differ between birds with and without parasites. In tests of all 3 of our hypotheses, we found sex-specific effects, highlighting the importance of considering sex in investigation of physiological responses to disturbance. Copyright 2007.

Suggested Citation

  • Frances Bonier & Paul R. Martin & Kimberly S. Sheldon & Jay P. Jensen & Sarah L. Foltz & John C. Wingfield, 2007. "Sex-specific consequences of life in the city," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 121-129, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:1:p:121-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl050
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nattapon Sirirat & Jin-Jenn Lu & Alex Tsung-Yu Hung & Shih-Yi Chen & Tu-Fa Lien, 2012. "Effects Different Levels of Nanoparticles Chromium Picolinate Supplementation on Growth Performance, Mineral Retention, and Immune Responses in Broiler Chickens," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(12), pages 1-48, November.
    2. Bennett, Victoria J. & Fernández-Juricic, Esteban & Zollner, Patrick A. & Beard, Matthew J. & Westphal, Lynne & Fisher, Cherie L. LeBlanc, 2011. "Modelling the responses of wildlife to human disturbance: An evaluation of alternative management scenarios for black-crowned night-herons," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(15), pages 2770-2779.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:1:p:121-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.