IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v18y2007i1p12-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of conspecifics and predation risk on the vigilance of elk (Cervus elaphus) in Yellowstone National Park

Author

Listed:
  • Mark A. Lung
  • Michael J. Childress

Abstract

Vigilance in socially foraging animals (e.g., elk) may serve to detect predators (i.e., reduce predation risk) or to monitor the behavior of conspecifics (i.e., reduce conspecific risk and/or increase reproductive benefits). These potential benefits and costs of vigilance may not be equal among different genders and age classes foraging together. We observed male and female elk from 3 age classes (yearlings, nonreproductive, reproductive) during 2 seasons (calving season, breeding season) that vary in social interactions (i.e., conspecific risk) and in 2 regions of Yellowstone National Park that varied in predation risk due to density of wolves. This study was designed to determine the potential functional benefit of vigilance across a range of herd sizes. If vigilance serves to monitor the behavior of conspecifics, we expected it to increase in the fall breeding season along with aggressive behaviors, regardless of changes in predation risk. If vigilance serves to detect predators, we expected it to increase in regions with wolves regardless of changes in conspecific risk. Adult male vigilance and aggression increased during the fall breeding season, but yearling males had significantly lower levels of vigilance. Adult female vigilance increased during the calving season, with increasing predator encounter risk, decreasing herd size, and edge position within the herd. Yearling female vigilance decreased with herd size but was lower than adult females. We conclude that the primary benefit of vigilance for male elk is to monitor conspecifics, but the primary benefit of vigilance for female elk is to detect potential predators. Copyright 2007.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark A. Lung & Michael J. Childress, 2007. "The influence of conspecifics and predation risk on the vigilance of elk (Cervus elaphus) in Yellowstone National Park," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 12-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:1:p:12-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl066
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillaume Rieucau & Pierrick Blanchard & Julien G A Martin & François-René Favreau & Anne W Goldizen & Olivier Pays, 2012. "Investigating Differences in Vigilance Tactic Use within and between the Sexes in Eastern Grey Kangaroos," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-8, September.
    2. Federico Tettamanti & Vincent A Viblanc, 2014. "Influences of Mating Group Composition on the Behavioral Time-Budget of Male and Female Alpine Ibex (Capra ibex) during the Rut," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:1:p:12-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.