IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v18y2007i1p108-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The mixed-species chorus as public information: túngara frogs eavesdrop on a heterospecific

Author

Listed:
  • Steven M. Phelps
  • A. Stanley Rand
  • Michael J. Ryan

Abstract

Multispecies choruses represent a promising but uninvestigated forum for public information. Although frogs exposed to a potential predator call more readily in the presence of conspecific calls than in their absence, none are known to make comparable use of heterospecific calls. To test for heterospecific eavesdropping, we isolated calling male túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus), presented them with a potential predator, and recorded their responses to playbacks of 1 of 4 stimuli: calls of a conspecific, a sympatric heterospecific (Leptodactylus labialis), an allopatric congener (Physalaemus enesefae), or silence. We found that males called more in response to the L. labialis call than to either the silent stimulus or the P. enesefae call. In contrast, the P. enesefae call did not result in significantly more calling than the silent stimulus. The conspecific call was the most effective at promoting calling. The data indicate that túngara frogs selectively attend to the call of a heterospecific. We hypothesize that such heterospecific eavesdropping contributes to the emergent behavior of mixed-species choruses. Copyright 2007.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven M. Phelps & A. Stanley Rand & Michael J. Ryan, 2007. "The mixed-species chorus as public information: túngara frogs eavesdrop on a heterospecific," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 108-114, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:1:p:108-114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl063
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:1:p:108-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.