IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i6p905-910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models of optimal foraging and resource partitioning: deep corollas for long tongues

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel A. Rodríguez-Gironés
  • Luis Santamaría

Abstract

We model the optimal foraging strategies for 2 nectarivore species, differing in the length of their proboscis, that exploit the nectar provided by 2 types of flowers, differing in the depths of their corollas. When like flowers appear in clumps, nectarivores must decide whether to forage at a patch of deep or shallow flowers. If nectarivores forage optimally, at least one flower type will be used by a single nectarivore species. Long-tongued foragers will normally visit deep flowers and short-tongued foragers shallow flowers, although extreme asymmetries in metabolic costs may lead to the opposite arrangement. When deep and shallow flowers are randomly interspersed, nectarivores must decide, on encounter with a flower, whether to collect its nectar or continue searching. At low nectarivore densities, the optimal strategy involves exploiting every encountered flower; however, as nectarivore densities increase and resources become scarce, long-tongued individuals should start concentrating on deep flowers and short-tongued individuals on shallow flowers. Therefore, regardless of the spatial distribution of flowers, corolla depth can determine which nectarivore species exploit the nectar from each flower type in a given community. It follows that corolla elongation can evolve as a means to keep nectar thieves at bay if short-tongued visitors are less efficient pollinators than long-tongued visitors. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel A. Rodríguez-Gironés & Luis Santamaría, 2006. "Models of optimal foraging and resource partitioning: deep corollas for long tongues," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(6), pages 905-910, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:6:p:905-910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:6:p:905-910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.