IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i5p839-848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open-cell parasitism shapes maternal investment patterns in the Red Mason bee Osmia rufa

Author

Listed:
  • Karsten Seidelmann

Abstract

Brood cell parasitism inflicts high fitness costs on solitary, nest-constructing bees. Many of these parasites enter open cells during its provisioning, when the mother bee is absent. Therefore, females can reduce the risk of open-cell parasitism by limiting the time they are away from the nest. However, provisioning efficiency (provisioning time per unit of progeny body mass) decreases due to aging. To limit the increasing risk of open-cell parasitism as the nesting season progresses, female bees could optimize their maternal investment strategy by shifting the sex ratio and the body size of offspring during the nesting season. This prediction was tested in the Red Mason bee Osmia rufa (O. bicornis), a stem- or hole-nesting, polylectic, univoltine megachilid bee. In O. rufa, the risk of open-cell parasitism was found to be correlated with cell provisioning time. Additionally, the provisioning efficiency of females declined during the nesting season to one-fourth of the initial value. However, cell-provisioning time did not increase correspondingly. Bees dealt with their decreasing provisioning efficiency by reducing the amount of stored larval food, leading to a reduction of offspring size and a seasonal shift toward males in the offspring sex ratio. The influence of provisioning efficiency and risk of open-cell parasitism on optimal offspring size was analyzed by means of a statistical model. The observed maternal investment pattern of Red Mason bees is an adaptive strategy to reduce open-cell parasitism. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Karsten Seidelmann, 2006. "Open-cell parasitism shapes maternal investment patterns in the Red Mason bee Osmia rufa," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(5), pages 839-848, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:5:p:839-848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:5:p:839-848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.