IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i5p828-832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of pattern symmetry on detection of disruptive and background-matching coloration

Author

Listed:
  • Innes C. Cuthill
  • Martin Stevens
  • Amy M.M. Windsor
  • Hannah J. Walker

Abstract

Two, logically distinct but sometimes compatible, mechanisms of camouflage are background-matching and disruptive coloration. In the former, an animal's coloration comprises a random sample of the background, and so target--background discrimination is impeded. In the latter, object or feature recognition is compromised by placing bold, high-contrast colors so that they break up the prey's body into apparently unconnected objects. Recent experimental evidence for the utility of disruptive colors, above and beyond that conferred by background matching, has been based on artificial prey with patterns lacking a plane of symmetry. However, it is plausible that the bilateral symmetry present in natural prey may compromise the efficiency of disruptive coloration, on account of the potency of symmetry as a cue in visual search. In this study, we tested this prediction in the field, by tracking the "survival" under bird predation of artificial mothlike targets placed on oak trees. These had background-matching color patches placed either disruptively or nondisruptively and with or without bilateral symmetry. We found that symmetry reduced the effectiveness of both nondisruptive and disruptive background-matching coloration to a similar degree so that the negative effects of symmetry on concealment are no greater for disruptive than nondisruptive patterns. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Innes C. Cuthill & Martin Stevens & Amy M.M. Windsor & Hannah J. Walker, 2006. "The effects of pattern symmetry on detection of disruptive and background-matching coloration," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(5), pages 828-832, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:5:p:828-832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:5:p:828-832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.