IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i5p741-750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ecology of conception and pregnancy failure in wild baboons

Author

Listed:
  • Jacinta C. Beehner
  • Daphne A. Onderdonk
  • Susan C. Alberts
  • Jeanne Altmann

Abstract

Environmental conditions are a key factor mediating reproductive success or failure. Consequently, many mammalian taxa have breeding seasons that coordinate critical reproductive stages with optimal environmental conditions. However, in contrast with most mammals, baboons (Papio cynocephalus) of Kenya reproduce throughout the year. Here we depart from the typical approach of evaluating seasonal effects on reproduction and engage in a more fine-grained analysis of the actual ecological conditions leading up to reproduction for females. Our aim was to determine how environmental conditions, in combination with social and demographic factors, might mediate baboon reproduction. The data set includes all female reproductive cycles from multiple baboon groups in the Amboseli basin between 1976 and 2004. Results indicate that after periods of drought or extreme heat, females were significantly less likely to cycle than expected. If females did cycle after these conditions, they were less likely to conceive; and if they did conceive after drought (heat effects were nonsignificant), they were less likely to have a successful pregnancy. Age also significantly predicted conceptive failure; conceptive probability was lowest among the youngest and oldest cycling females. There was also a trend for high ambient temperatures to contribute to fetal loss during the first trimester but not other trimesters. Finally, group size and drought conditions interacted in their effects on the probability of conception. Although females in all groups had equal conception probabilities during optimal conditions, females in large groups were less likely than those in small groups to conceive during periods of drought. These results indicate that in a highly variable environment, baboon reproductive success is mediated by the interaction between proximate ecological conditions and individual demographic factors. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacinta C. Beehner & Daphne A. Onderdonk & Susan C. Alberts & Jeanne Altmann, 2006. "The ecology of conception and pregnancy failure in wild baboons," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(5), pages 741-750, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:5:p:741-750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Su-Jen Roberts & Eleni Nikitopoulos & Marina Cords, 2014. "Factors affecting low resident male siring success in one-male groups of blue monkeys," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 852-861.
    2. Daphne Kerhoas & Dyah Perwitasari-Farajallah & Muhammad Agil & Anja Widdig & Antje Engelhardt, 2014. "Social and ecological factors influencing offspring survival in wild macaques," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1164-1172.
    3. Joan B Silk & Shirley C Strum, 2010. "Maternal Condition Does Not Influence Birth Sex Ratios in Anubis Baboons (Papio anubis)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-7, September.
    4. Brogan M. Stewart & Sarah E. Turner & H. Damon Matthews, 2020. "Climate change impacts on potential future ranges of non-human primate species," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 2301-2318, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:5:p:741-750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.