IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i4p614-621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic evidence for kin-based female social structure in common eiders (Somateria mollissima)

Author

Listed:
  • Laura McKinnon
  • H. Grant Gilchrist
  • Kim T. Scribner

Abstract

Kin-based social groups are commonly studied among cooperatively breeding species but have been less studied in "nontraditional" group breeding systems. We investigated the presence of kin-based sociality among females in the common eider (Somateria mollisima), a colonial nesting sea duck that exhibits high levels of natal philopatry in females. Previous studies of female sociality in common eiders have been restricted to observations during brood rearing. However, aggregations of female common eiders are also observed during other periods of the life cycle such as colony arrival and nesting. Here we apply a novel, empirical framework using molecular markers and field sampling to genetically characterize female social groups at several stages of the common eider life cycle. When compared with mean estimates of interindividual relatedness for the entire colony, significantly higher levels of relatedness were found between females within groups arriving to the colony in flight, between females and nearest neighbors at the time of nest site selection, and between groups of females departing the colony with ducklings. Both full-sibling and half-sibling equivalent relationships were also found within these groups. Therefore, throughout each of several stages including in-flight colony arrival, nesting, and brood rearing, we provide the first genetically confirmed evidence of female kin-based social groups in common eiders and anseriformes in general. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura McKinnon & H. Grant Gilchrist & Kim T. Scribner, 2006. "Genetic evidence for kin-based female social structure in common eiders (Somateria mollissima)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(4), pages 614-621, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:4:p:614-621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ark002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:4:p:614-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.