IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i3p353-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emasculation to plug up females: the significance of pedipalp damage in Nephila fenestrata

Author

Listed:
  • Lutz Fromhage
  • Jutta M. Schneider

Abstract

Female multiple mating selects for male adaptations that maximize fertilization success in a context of sperm competition. While male mating strategies usually reflect a trade-off between present and future reproduction, this trade-off is largely removed in systems where the maximum number of matings for males is very small. Selection may then favor extreme mechanisms of paternity protection that amount to a maximal investment in a single mating. Males in several arthropod taxa break off parts of their copulatory organs during mating, and it has frequently been suggested that mutilated males can thus secure their paternity. Nevertheless, such a mechanism has rarely been confirmed directly. Here we study the golden orb spider Nephila fenestrata, which has a mating system with potentially cannibalistic, polyandrous females, and males that are often functionally sterile after mating with one female only. We show that males in this species can indeed protect their paternity by obstructing the female's genital openings with fragments of their copulatory organs. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Lutz Fromhage & Jutta M. Schneider, 2006. "Emasculation to plug up females: the significance of pedipalp damage in Nephila fenestrata," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(3), pages 353-357, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:3:p:353-357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arj037
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matjaž Kuntner & Jonathan A Coddington, 2009. "Discovery of the Largest Orbweaving Spider Species: The Evolution of Gigantism in Nephila," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-5, October.
    2. Zachary Emberts & Christine W. Miller & Daniel Kiehl & Colette M. St. Mary, 2017. "Cut your losses: self-amputation of injured limbs increases survival," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 1047-1054.
    3. Clare C. Rittschof & Samantha A. Hilber & M. Scarlett Tudor & Colette M. St Mary, 2012. "Modeling male reproductive strategies and optimal mate number in an orb-web spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 1-10.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:3:p:353-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.