IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i3p345-352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex ratios under asymmetrical local mate competition in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis

Author

Listed:
  • David M. Shuker
  • Ido Pen
  • Stuart A. West

Abstract

Sex ratio theory has proved remarkably useful in testing the adaptive nature of animal behavior. A particularly productive area in this respect is Hamilton's theory of local mate competition (LMC), which has been extended in numerous directions to include greater biological realism, allowing more detailed tests in specific organisms. We have presented one such extension, termed asymmetrical LMC, which occurs when egg laying by females on a patch is asynchronous, and emerging males do not disperse, resulting in the extent of LMC on a patch varying over time. Our aim here is to test whether the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis responds to variation in the degree of asymmetrical LMC. Specifically, we show that females adjust their offspring sex ratios in response to (1) variation in the amount of asynchrony in emergence between broods on a patch and (2) the number and proportion of previously parasitized hosts on the patch. Our results provide qualitative support for the predictions of theory, suggesting new levels of complexity in the sex ratio behavior of this much-studied organism. However, our results do not always provide quantitative support for theory, suggesting further complexities that must be clarified. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • David M. Shuker & Ido Pen & Stuart A. West, 2006. "Sex ratios under asymmetrical local mate competition in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(3), pages 345-352, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:3:p:345-352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arj034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:3:p:345-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.