IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i2p310-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ultraviolet reflectance of great spotted cuckoo eggs and egg discrimination by magpies

Author

Listed:
  • Jesús M. Avilés
  • Juan J. Soler
  • Tomas Pérez-Contreras
  • Manuel Soler
  • Anders Pape Møller

Abstract

Hosts of obligate avian brood parasites use visual cues to distinguish between their own eggs and those of the parasite. Despite major differences between human and bird vision, most previous studies on cuckoo egg mimicry estimated color matching based on human color vision. Undetected by humans, ultraviolet reflectance (UVR) may play a previously ignored role for rejection behavior in avian brood parasite systems. We explored this possibility by manipulating UVR of great spotted cuckoo Clamator glandarius eggs and assessing the response of magpie Pica pica hosts. We coated cuckoo eggs with an ultraviolet (UV) light blocker that reduced UVR but left the human visible reflectance (400--700 nm) unaltered. The first control treatment also coated the eggs but did not alter their reflectance. A second control group of cuckoo eggs was maintained uncoated to control for handling effects on magpie discrimination. We artificially parasitized a third of a breeding magpie population with each type of experimental egg and studied the rejection of cuckoo eggs. We failed to find significant differences between rejection rate of cuckoo eggs with and without reduced reflectance in the UV region. Our results indicate that artificial reduction of UVR of cuckoo eggs does not affect the probability of ejection by magpie hosts. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesús M. Avilés & Juan J. Soler & Tomas Pérez-Contreras & Manuel Soler & Anders Pape Møller, 2006. "Ultraviolet reflectance of great spotted cuckoo eggs and egg discrimination by magpies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(2), pages 310-314, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:310-314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arj031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:310-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.