IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i2p246-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of predator behavior and proximity on risk assessment by Columbian black-tailed deer

Author

Listed:
  • Theodore Stankowich
  • Richard G. Coss

Abstract

In predator-prey encounters, many factors influence risk perception by prey and their decision to flee. Previous studies indicate that prey take flight at longer distances when they detect predators at longer distances and when the predator's behavior indicates the increased likelihood of attack. We examined the flight decisions of Columbian black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) using an approaching human whose speed, directness of approach, directness of gaze, and simulated gun carrying varied. Deer fled at greater distances when approached more quickly and directly, and there was a concave-down quadratic trend in the relationship between the distances at which the predator began its approach and at which the deer became alert (alert distance [AD]), indicating that deer have a zone of awareness beyond which there is a delay in detecting an approaching predator. Time spent assessing the approacher (assessment time) was shorter during faster approaches and was positively related with AD. Deer fled at longer distances and had shorter assessment times when they were already alert to the predator at the initiation of approach. Males fled at shorter distances than females when approached during the gun-holding condition, and males had shorter assessment times than females when the approacher averted his gaze. Such sex differences in risk assessment might reflect male motivation during the mating season as well as exposure to human hunting. We suggest that risk assessment is affected the by the predator's behavior, the state of awareness of the prey, and the distance at which they detect the predator. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodore Stankowich & Richard G. Coss, 2006. "Effects of predator behavior and proximity on risk assessment by Columbian black-tailed deer," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(2), pages 246-254, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:246-254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arj020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William E. Cooper & Pilar López & José Martín & Valentín Pérez-Mellado, 2012. "Latency to flee from an immobile predator: effects of predation risk and cost of immobility for the prey," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 790-797.
    2. Anders Pape Møller & László Zsolt Garamszegi, 2012. "Between individual variation in risk-taking behavior and its life history consequences," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 843-853.
    3. Jana, Debaldev & Banerjee, Aniket & Samanta, G.P., 2017. "Degree of prey refuges: Control the competition among prey and foraging ability of predator," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 350-362.
    4. Nicholas M Sutton & Michael A Weston & Patrick J Guay & Jenna Tregoweth & James P O’Dwyer, 2021. "A Bayesian optimal escape model reveals bird species differ in their capacity to habituate to humans," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1064-1074.
    5. Diogo S M Samia & Daniel T Blumstein, 2014. "Phi Index: A New Metric to Test the Flush Early and Avoid the Rush Hypothesis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:246-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.