IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i2p188-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Burrow fractal dimension and foraging success in subterranean rodents: a simulation

Author

Listed:
  • S.C. Le Comber
  • E.W. Seabloom
  • S.S. Romañach

Abstract

For animals that forage underground, the success with which food items are located may be closely related to burrow architecture. Fractal dimension, which describes how a burrow explores the surrounding area in a way that is independent of burrow length, is an obvious choice for a single metric describing burrow shape. Although it is often assumed that burrows of high fractal dimension will be associated with greater foraging success, this has not previously been demonstrated. In this study, we use computer simulations to study the success with which burrows of different fractal dimensions locate randomly distributed food items. In addition, we examine the effect of different patterns of food distribution (in particular the patchiness with which food items are distributed) and consider how using different criteria for locating food items affects the relationship between fractal dimension and foraging success. We conclude that, under a wide range of plausible assumptions about the ways in which subterranean rodents forage, burrows of high fractal dimension are more successful at locating food items than burrows of lower fractal dimension. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • S.C. Le Comber & E.W. Seabloom & S.S. Romañach, 2006. "Burrow fractal dimension and foraging success in subterranean rodents: a simulation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(2), pages 188-195, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:188-195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arj011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:188-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.