IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i2p164-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The large-male advantage in brown antechinuses: female choice, male dominance, and delayed male death

Author

Listed:
  • Diana O. Fisher
  • A. Cockburn

Abstract

Male-biased dimorphism in body size is usually attributed to sexual selection acting on males, through either male competition or female choice. Brown antechinuses (Antechinus stuartii) are sexually dimorphic in size, and heavier males are known to sire more offspring in the wild. We investigated four possible mechanisms that might explain this large-male reproductive advantage. We tested if there is a female preference for large males, a female preference for dominant males, if larger males compete more effectively for mates, and if there is a survival advantage for large males during the mating season. We established nesting groups of males in captivity and conducted mate choice trials in which males from nesting groups either could or could not interact. We assessed male dominance rank and recorded survival times after mating. Females did not prefer larger males directly. The results suggest that the other three mechanisms of sexual selection tested account for the large-male advantage: large males competed more successfully for mates, so were socially dominant; females rejected subordinates (males they saw losing twice in contests to previous mates); and dominant males survived for longer after their first mating. Females judged male rank based on direct observation of male competitive interactions at the time of mating and apparently could not distinguish rank from male scent. Effects of size and dominance on male reproductive success are not confounded by age because male antechinuses are semelparous. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana O. Fisher & A. Cockburn, 2006. "The large-male advantage in brown antechinuses: female choice, male dominance, and delayed male death," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(2), pages 164-171, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:164-171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arj012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:164-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.