IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i1p1-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How outcrossing hermaphrodites sense the presence of conspecifics and suppress female allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Dáša Schleicherová
  • Maria Cristina Lorenzi
  • Gabriella Sella

Abstract

One of the greatest remaining problems in the field of sex allocation is the variation across species of the extent to which individuals adjust their offspring sex ratio or sex allocation according to environmental conditions. Particularly in the field of sex allocation, there is a lack of research on the mechanisms and cues involved. We address this problem in the outcrossing simultaneous hermaphroditic polychaete Ophryotrocha diadema, which shifts sex allocation by suppressing the female function in the presence of reproductive competitors or multiple partners. We document that O. diadema hermaphrodites can evaluate group size by means of a species-specific chemical released by mature individuals in water. The perception of such a water-borne signal is sufficient to trigger the observed shift in sex allocation, i.e., a suppression of the female function, irrespective of the frequency of encounters with conspecifics. Under natural conditions, such a pheromone will favor partners' encounters and the adjustment of individual sex allocation according to the numbers of reproductive competitors and/or potential partners. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Dáša Schleicherová & Maria Cristina Lorenzi & Gabriella Sella, 2006. "How outcrossing hermaphrodites sense the presence of conspecifics and suppress female allocation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(1), pages 1-5, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:1:p:1-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ari093
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:1:p:1-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.