IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i6p1001-1007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Territorial male gobies respond aggressively to sneakers but do not adjust their sperm expenditure

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Scaggiante
  • Maria Berica Rasotto
  • Chiara Romualdi
  • Andrea Pilastro

Abstract

We investigated whether mating behavior (sperm expenditure, courtship rate, and nest guarding) varied according to different levels of sperm competition in territorial males of two goby species, the grass and the black gobies. We measured sperm expenditure (sperm released after 30 min from the beginning of the spawning), male courtship rate, and nest-guarding behavior in territorial males of both species during simulated spawnings, in which we varied the number of attending sneakers. Our results showed that, in both species, territorial males adjusted their effort in nest guarding to the presence of rival sneakers by increasing the time spent patrolling the territory and attacking the sneakers. In contrast, sperm expenditure and male courtship rate were not influenced by the number of attending sneakers. These results are in agreement with those reported for other fish with alternative mating tactics and help to interpret previous inconsistencies between theoretical predictions and measured levels of sperm released at different levels of sperm competition by sneakers of the two gobiids studied here. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Scaggiante & Maria Berica Rasotto & Chiara Romualdi & Andrea Pilastro, 2005. "Territorial male gobies respond aggressively to sneakers but do not adjust their sperm expenditure," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(6), pages 1001-1007, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:6:p:1001-1007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ari081
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:6:p:1001-1007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.