IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i4p779-787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Egg size and reproductive allocation in eusocial thrips

Author

Listed:
  • Brenda D. Kranz

Abstract

Reproductive allocation, in terms of fecundity and egg size, has been given little consideration in eusocial societies. To begin to address this, absolute and body size--adjusted egg volumes were compared, along with fecundity, between the foundress and her subfertile soldier offspring in the eusocial, gall-inducing thrips, Kladothrips hamiltoni, Kladothrips waterhousei, and Kladothrips habrus, and a congeneric, Kladothrips morrisi, with fully fecund soldiers. Soldiers produced significantly larger eggs than the foundress in all species except K. morrisi, where egg volumes did not differ. After accounting for body size, soldiers produced significantly smaller eggs than the foundress in K. morrisi and marginally so in K. waterhousei, but egg sizes did not differ in K. hamiltoni and K. habrus. When egg size and fecundity data are combined, K. morrisi soldiers invest less in reproduction than the foundress, and in conjunction with other life-history features the species can be considered eusocial. Maximum likelihood analyses reveal relatively low reproductive allocation skew in the ancestral lineages and high skew in the derived lineages, but the trend is not significant when fecundity and egg size are considered separately. Gall size covaried negatively with soldier-to-foundress relative body size--adjusted egg size and reproductive allocation and marginally so with fecundity, suggesting that gall size is a determinant of egg size and fecundity trade-offs in eusocial thrips and providing the strongest support to date that gall size has featured in the social evolution of this clade. This study highlights that data on fecundity alone may be insufficient for assessing reproductive division of labor. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Brenda D. Kranz, 2005. "Egg size and reproductive allocation in eusocial thrips," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(4), pages 779-787, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:4:p:779-787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ari053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:4:p:779-787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.