IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i3p656-660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Water-seeking behavior in insects harboring hairworms: should the host collaborate?

Author

Listed:
  • David G. Biron
  • Fleur Ponton
  • Cécile Joly
  • Aurélie Menigoz
  • Ben Hanelt
  • Frédéric Thomas

Abstract

We explored the idea that hosts infected with manipulative parasites might mitigate the costs of infection by collaborating with the parasite rather than resisting it. Nematomorphs are usually considered to be manipulative parasites of arthropods because they cause hosts to seek an aquatic environment, which is needed by the adult parasite. We placed infected cricket hosts in situations of forced noncompliance and compared some fitness parameters (life expectancy, gonad development, and reproductive behaviors) in noncompliant hosts and hosts allowed to express parasite-induced behavior. Compared to uninfected controls, reduced survival was observed in both males and females from the two categories of infected hosts, collaborative or not. A substantial proportion of collaborative females produced eggs or had developed ovaries while such phenomena were never observed among noncollaborative ones. Collaborative females retained a nymphal phenotype, but adult males nevertheless courted and produced spermatophores to such females. However, collaborative females had difficulties mounting males, taking spermatophores and/or ovipositing. In contrast to females, all males were entirely castrated by the parasite regardless of their behavior, collaborative or not. Thus, bringing the parasite into water does not effectively mitigate the costs of infection for the host. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • David G. Biron & Fleur Ponton & Cécile Joly & Aurélie Menigoz & Ben Hanelt & Frédéric Thomas, 2005. "Water-seeking behavior in insects harboring hairworms: should the host collaborate?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(3), pages 656-660, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:3:p:656-660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ari039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:3:p:656-660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.