IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i3p624-633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allometry and variability of resource allocation to reproduction in a wild reindeer population

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Loison
  • Olav Strand

Abstract

The differential allocation of energy to either reproduction or survival represents a major conflict with important implications for patterns of life history. Here, we explore how covariation between maternal body weight and fetal weight vary according to fetal sex in a wild reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) population during two contrasting years. Maternal weights differed during the 2 years, probably because of a difference in population density. We could not detect any change in the allocation to reproduction depending on female phenotypic distribution. Male fetuses were heavier than female fetuses, with the same relative dimorphism in both years. There was no support for a correlation between the sex of the fetus carried by a female and her weight. Our results suggest that the level of resource allocation to reproduction during the prenatal period is strongly determined by female body weight and the allometric relationship between body weight and metabolic rate. We discuss the consequences of our results for population dynamics. We call for an integration of inter- and intraspecific allometric approaches to better understand constraints and variation in life-history traits. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Loison & Olav Strand, 2005. "Allometry and variability of resource allocation to reproduction in a wild reindeer population," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(3), pages 624-633, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:3:p:624-633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ari037
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:3:p:624-633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.