IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i3p571-579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How cricket frog females deal with a noisy world: habitat-related differences in auditory tuning

Author

Listed:
  • Klaudia Witte
  • Hamilton E. Farris
  • Michael J. Ryan
  • Walter Wilczynski

Abstract

Cricket frogs (Acris crepitans) occupy a variety of acoustically different habitats ranging from pine forest to open grassland. There is geographic variation in their calls and the tuning of their basilar papilla (BP) correlated with habitat. Here, we characterize the spectral content of environmental noise from two habitats, one a pine forest (Stengl) and one a grassland (Gill) habitat. We then used rounded exponential filter functions based on the mean tuning of auditory fibers in Stengl and Gill females to model the BP tuning characteristics of an average female from the two cricket frog populations occupying those habitats to compare their ability to filter out environmental noise. Noise recordings were made at both sites from 1800 to 2400 h on multiple nights throughout a breeding season (March through early August). Noise spectra were similar at both sites. Cross-correlation analyses of the sampled noise indicated that noise spectra were consistent throughout the night and varied little over the season other than during the month of May. The model auditory filter simulating an average Stengl female was significantly better than one simulating an average Gill female at filtering environmental noise at both sites. Previous work had shown that cricket frog calls suffered greater attenuation and degradation in the Stengl site than the Gill site but that the male calls from Stengl frogs suffered less attenuation and less degradation than Gill calls during transmission through both habitats. These new results demonstrate that frogs from the more acoustically challenging Stengl habitat have enhanced both the sender and receiver portions of their communication system, evolving calls that transmit better and auditory filters that better eliminate noise. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Klaudia Witte & Hamilton E. Farris & Michael J. Ryan & Walter Wilczynski, 2005. "How cricket frog females deal with a noisy world: habitat-related differences in auditory tuning," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(3), pages 571-579, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:3:p:571-579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ari032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arne K.D. Schmidt & Heiner Römer & Klaus Riede, 2013. "Spectral niche segregation and community organization in a tropical cricket assemblage," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 470-480.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:3:p:571-579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.