IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i3p521-527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group stability and homing behavior but no kin group structures in a coral reef fish

Author

Listed:
  • N. Kolm
  • E.A. Hoffman
  • J. Olsson
  • A. Berglund
  • A.G. Jones

Abstract

Understanding the reasons behind stable group formations has received considerable theoretical and empirical attention. Stable groups displaying homing behavior have been suggested to form as a result of, for instance, benefits from knowledge of the social or physical environment or through kin selection and the forming of kin groups. However, no one has disentangled preference for grouping in a familiar location from preference for grouping with familiar or related individuals. To investigate this, we conducted a series of field experiments and a group genetic analysis on the group-living Banggai cardinalfish (Pterapogon kauderni). We found homing behavior but no evidence for recognition of familiar group members. Instead, homing was based on the original location of their group rather than the individuals in that group. Moreover, we found no evidence for kin structures within these groups. We suggest that benefits from living in a known social environment drive homing behavior in this species and that homing behavior is not enough for the formation of kin group structures. Instead, our results suggest that kin recognition may be a prerequisite for the forming of kin groups. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • N. Kolm & E.A. Hoffman & J. Olsson & A. Berglund & A.G. Jones, 2005. "Group stability and homing behavior but no kin group structures in a coral reef fish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(3), pages 521-527, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:3:p:521-527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ari022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:3:p:521-527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.