Author
Listed:
- Kevin M. Pilz
- Henrik G. Smith
- Malte Andersson
Abstract
Chicks of obligate brood parasites employ a variety of morphological and behavioral strategies to outcompete nest mates. Elevated competitiveness is favored by natural selection because parasitic chicks are not related to their host parents or nest mates. When chicks of conspecific brood parasites (CBPs) are unrelated to their hosts, they and their parents would also benefit from traits that enhance competitiveness. However, these traits must be inducible tactics in CBPs, since conspecific brood parasitism (CBP) is facultative. Such tactics could be induced by resources passed to offspring through the egg. Thus, females engaging in CBP should allocate to their eggs resources that will enhance offspring competitiveness. We tested this prediction in a population of European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) breeding in southern Sweden. Previous research showed that almost all CBPs in this population are floater females that have yet to breed in the current season. We identified putative brood parasitic eggs through monitoring egg laying and verified parasitism using protein fingerprinting. We then determined whether parasitic eggs were larger, larger-yolked, or had higher concentrations of yolk testosterone or androstenedione than control eggs. The 14 brood parasitic eggs laid in active nests (those with clutches of at least two eggs that were eventually incubated) did not differ from controls in any of these characteristics. Ten dumped eggs, laid in nonactive nest-boxes or on the ground, were smaller and smaller-yolked than control eggs but did not differ in yolk androgen concentrations. The failure of our prediction could be the result of high costs of investing in eggs, lack of competition-based benefits for chicks, or physiological constraints on egg manipulation. Copyright 2005.
Suggested Citation
Kevin M. Pilz & Henrik G. Smith & Malte Andersson, 2005.
"Brood parasitic European starlings do not lay high-quality eggs,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(3), pages 507-513, May.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:3:p:507-513
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:3:p:507-513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.