IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i2p346-351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female choice and male humoral immune response in the lekking great snipe (Gallinago media)

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Ekblom
  • Stein Are Sæther
  • Dennis Hasselquist
  • David Hannersjö
  • Peder Fiske
  • John Atle Kålås
  • Jacob Höglund

Abstract

Parasites and diseases constitute major evolutionary forces in many natural populations, and thus having an efficient immune defense to resist infections is crucial for many organisms. Properties of the immune response may also influence mate choice decisions in many animals. Theory predicts several advantages for females when choosing males with superior immune systems. These benefits can be both direct (e.g. increased paternal care and reduced disease transmission) and indirect (good genes). We have investigated female choice with respect to antibody response to two novel antigens in males of a lekking bird, the great snipe (Gallinago media). Because of the lek mating system, female choice probably mainly incurs indirect (genetic) rather than direct benefits. Males responded to vaccination with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids by producing specific antibodies to both antigens. Triggering the immune system had no negative impact on display activities or survival. Males that were chosen by females as mates had on average higher antibody response to the tetanus antigen than their neighbors. We did not, however, find any covariance between the strength of the antibody response and male mating success. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Ekblom & Stein Are Sæther & Dennis Hasselquist & David Hannersjö & Peder Fiske & John Atle Kålås & Jacob Höglund, 2005. "Female choice and male humoral immune response in the lekking great snipe (Gallinago media)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(2), pages 346-351, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:2:p:346-351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh168
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:2:p:346-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.