IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i1p196-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male attractiveness covaries with fighting ability but not with prior fight outcome in house crickets

Author

Listed:
  • Kate E. Savage
  • John Hunt
  • Michael D. Jennions
  • Robert Brooks

Abstract

In many species males that tend to win fights against other males are more attractive to females. There are three ways in which male fighting ability and attractiveness may be associated: (1) attractiveness and fighting ability are influenced by the same underlying traits (e.g., body size), (2) females prefer males that have directly observed winning fights, or (3) winning previous fights indirectly improves a male's chance of being preferred by females. The last possibility may arise as a consequence of the "loser effect"; in many species when a male loses a fight his probability of losing subsequent fights increases. There are, however, no studies testing whether such a "loser effect" also influences male attractiveness. Here we show that male attractiveness and fighting ability are positively correlated in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus. Our experiment was designed so that females could not directly observe the outcome of fights, thus eliminating possibility (2) above. We then tested between possibilities (1) and (3) by making use of the fact that in some cricket species the "loser effect" can be eliminated experimentally by 'shaking' a male and stimulating the motor program for flying. We showed that in A. domesticus 'shaking' does affect the outcome of subsequent fights. Males that had won two previous fights were less likely to win a fight after being 'shaken' than when subject to a control treatment. In contrast, males that had lost two previous fights were more likely to win a fight after being 'shaken' than when they were not shaken. There was, however, no effect of 'shaking' on male attractiveness. We conclude that the "loser effect" does not alter the tendency for large, dominant males to be attractive to females. Instead, it appears that there are traits correlated with both fighting ability and attractiveness. One such trait is body size. Fight winners were significantly larger than losers and attractiveness was positively correlated with male body size. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Kate E. Savage & John Hunt & Michael D. Jennions & Robert Brooks, 2005. "Male attractiveness covaries with fighting ability but not with prior fight outcome in house crickets," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(1), pages 196-200, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:196-200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh143
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:196-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.