IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i1p159-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship of visual and olfactory signal parameters in a food-deceptive flower mimicry system

Author

Listed:
  • C. Giovanni Galizia
  • Jan Kunze
  • Andreas Gumbert
  • Anna-Karin Borg-Karlson
  • Silke Sachse
  • Christian Markl
  • Randolf Menzel

Abstract

Pollinators such as bees are attracted to flowers by their visual display and their scent. Although most flowers reinforce visits by providing pollen and/or nectar, there are species--notably from the orchid family--that do not but do resemble rewarding species. These mimicry relationships provide ideal opportunities for investigating the evolution of floral signals and their impact on pollinator behavior. Here, we have reanalyzed a case of specialized food mimicry between the orchid Orchis israelitica and its model, the lily Bellevalia flexuosa. Based on current knowledge of insect sensory physiology, we were able to characterize both the visual and olfactory signals of model and mimic, as well as of two phylogenetically related orchids. By using a color vision model, we mapped each species' visual signals to the perceptual space of honeybees and found an apparent shift of the mimic's visual signals towards the model. We confirm that visual mimicry is present. We analyzed the flower odors by using gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy. We related these signals to the perceptual space of the pollinators by testing the scent extracts physiologically, using in vivo brain imaging. We found no evidence of olfactory mimicry. The results indicate that evolutionary pressure acts on the visual, but not olfactory, traits of O. israelitica toward a higher similarity to its model. Apparently, odor mismatch does not prevent a bee from landing on a flower that has the expected visual display. The results therefore argue for the dominance of visual stimuli in short-distance flower choice. The orchid may still depend on long-distance olfactory attraction originating from neighboring model plants. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Giovanni Galizia & Jan Kunze & Andreas Gumbert & Anna-Karin Borg-Karlson & Silke Sachse & Christian Markl & Randolf Menzel, 2005. "Relationship of visual and olfactory signal parameters in a food-deceptive flower mimicry system," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(1), pages 159-168, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:159-168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh147
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter G. Kevan & Randolf Menzel, 2012. "The plight of pollination and the interface of neurobiology, ecology and food security," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 300-310, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:159-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.