IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i6p997-1002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex ratio variation in the cooperatively breeding alpine marmot Marmota marmota

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique Allainé

Abstract

In cooperatively breeding vertebrate species, a clear theoretical prediction about the direction of sex ratio adjustment can be made: mothers should bias the sex ratio of their offspring towards the helping sex when helpers are absent. A consistent trend in the direction predicted by theory exists in cooperative birds, but theory is still poorly tested in cooperative mammals. Here, multivariate analyses are applied to a long-term data set to test this prediction in two ways in the alpine marmot: (1) across females in a population and (2) in individual females across multiple years. It was shown that in the alpine marmot offspring sex ratio was biased towards the helping sex (males) when helpers were absent, whereas helped mothers produced unbiased sex ratio. Unhelped mothers did not adjust the litter size but produced more sons and fewer daughters than helped mothers. These results support the theoretical prediction and explain well the male bias observed among juvenile alpine marmots at the population level. The occurrence of possible sex ratio manipulations in cooperatively breeding vertebrates is also discussed. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique Allainé, 2004. "Sex ratio variation in the cooperatively breeding alpine marmot Marmota marmota," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(6), pages 997-1002, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:6:p:997-1002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh105
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:6:p:997-1002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.