IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i6p952-960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pup escorting in the communal breeding banded mongoose: behavior, benefits, and maintenance

Author

Listed:
  • Jason S. Gilchrist

Abstract

In cooperatively breeding species, helpers typically provide food to offspring, and distribute food throughout the brood or litter. However, in the communal breeding banded mongoose (Mungos mungo), some group members escort individual pups during their period of dependence, and escorts consistently associate with the same pup, although not all pups have an escort. The aim of the present study was to determine whether group members actively care for pups, pups benefit from association, and escorts or pups maintain association. Adult banded mongooses provision, protect, carry, groom, and play with pups. Although escorts fed pups more than did nonescorts, escorted pups were neither larger nor in better condition than were nonescorted pups at the end of the association period. Nevertheless, escorted pups were more likely to survive the association period than were nonescorted pups, providing evidence that carers confer beneficial effects on their recipients. However, the recipients are unlikely to be the genetic offspring of the escort because it is the pup that maintains the pup-escort association, and escorts, rather than showing a preference for provisioning their paired pup, follow a "feed the closest pup" rule. Although carers gain indirect fitness benefits through increasing survival of related pups, the lack of kin discrimination means carers are unable to maximize their fitness by preferentially escorting their own offspring or the offspring of closer relatives. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason S. Gilchrist, 2004. "Pup escorting in the communal breeding banded mongoose: behavior, benefits, and maintenance," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(6), pages 952-960, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:6:p:952-960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh071
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Garay, József & Varga, Zoltán, 2011. "Survivor’s dilemma: Defend the group or flee?," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 217-225.
    2. Mai Sakai & Ding Wang & Kexiong Wang & Songhai Li & Tomonari Akamatsu, 2011. "Do Porpoises Choose Their Associates? A New Method for Analyzing Social Relationships among Cetaceans," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-8, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:6:p:952-960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.