IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i6p907-915.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reproductive promiscuity in the splendid fairy-wren: effects of group size and auxiliary reproduction

Author

Listed:
  • Michael S. Webster
  • Keith A. Tarvin
  • Elaina M. Tuttle
  • Stephen Pruett-Jones

Abstract

Extrapair fertilizations complicate our understanding of cooperative breeding in a number of ways. For example, auxiliaries may reduce the costs of seeking extrapair fertilizations for breeding males or females, and auxiliary males may themselves seek copulations with the breeding female in their own group. We employed microsatellite markers to examine patterns of parentage in the cooperatively breeding splendid fairy-wren (Malurus splendens melanotus). Our study population exhibited a relatively high level of extrapair paternity (42% of 386 offspring) with considerable annual variation (range = 24--52%). Across years the proportion of offspring sired by extrapair males was significantly correlated with the average number of auxiliaries per group. Furthermore, the proportion of extrapair young within a brood was related to group composition; groups with multiple auxiliaries were twice as likely as groups with zero or one auxiliary to contain extrapair young. Most offspring were sired by dominant breeding males, but auxiliary males sired approximately 25% of all extrapair young (10% of all offspring), and about half of these were cases in which the auxiliary male sired offspring in his own group. Within-group sirings by auxiliary males were most common after replacement of the breeding female, and they also appeared to be more likely when the auxiliary was not related to the breeding male. Thus, the presence of auxiliary males increased the likelihood that females would produce extrapair young, and although incest avoidance mechanisms usually prevent within-group copulations by auxiliary males, a conflict of interest among group males arises when a new female joins the group. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael S. Webster & Keith A. Tarvin & Elaina M. Tuttle & Stephen Pruett-Jones, 2004. "Reproductive promiscuity in the splendid fairy-wren: effects of group size and auxiliary reproduction," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(6), pages 907-915, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:6:p:907-915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh093
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Çağlar Akçay & Rose J. Swift & Veronica A. Reed & Janis L. Dickinson, 2013. "Vocal kin recognition in kin neighborhoods of western bluebirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 898-905.
    2. M. Y. L. Wong & L. A. Jordan & S. Marsh-Rollo & S. St-Cyr & J. O. Reynolds & K. A. Stiver & J. K. Desjardins & J. L. Fitzpatrick & S. Balshine, 2012. "Mating systems in cooperative breeders: the roles of resource dispersion and conflict mitigation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 521-530.
    3. Lyanne Brouwer & Martijn van de Pol & Andrew Cockburn, 2014. "Habitat geometry does not affect levels of extrapair paternity in an extremely unfaithful fairy-wren," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 531-537.
    4. Emma I. Greig & Michael S. Webster, 2013. "Spatial decoupling of song and plumage generates novel phenotypes between 2 avian subspecies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 1004-1013.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:6:p:907-915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.