Author
Listed:
- Wendt Müller
- Corine M. Eising
- Cor Dijkstra
- Ton G. G. Groothuis
Abstract
Hatching asynchrony in birds produces an age and size hierarchy among siblings. Later-hatching chicks have a competitive disadvantage, and brood reduction may occur when food availability is insufficient to raise all chicks. When early-hatched chicks fail to survive or if the circumstances allow raising all chicks, mothers should reverse the disadvantage to later-hatched chicks. Increasing deposition of maternal androgens with the laying sequence has been suggested to compensate for detrimental effects of hatching asynchrony, allowing a more precise adjustment of the survival probabilities of each chick. Here, we show for black-headed gulls that the increase in yolk testosterone with each successive egg is greater when the mother incubates longer before clutch completion, which is the major determinant of the degree of hatching asynchrony. This finding supports the idea that yolk testosterone has a compensatory function in the context of hatching asynchrony. Our data further show that if the time needed to complete a clutch is lengthened, the developmental differences due to incubation between the first- and the last-laid eggs increase. In addition, the onset of incubation before clutch completion occurs sooner as the breeding season progresses. Both long inter-egg intervals and the seasonal shift in incubation behavior enhance the necessity of compensation for later-hatching chicks. Indeed, yolk levels of testosterone increased more steeply over the laying order, if the duration of the egg-laying period was extended and in later-laid clutches. We suggest that prolactin plays a key role in the adjustment of testosterone allocation to the incubation pattern. Copyright 2004.
Suggested Citation
Wendt Müller & Corine M. Eising & Cor Dijkstra & Ton G. G. Groothuis, 2004.
"Within-clutch patterns of yolk testosterone vary with the onset of incubation in black-headed gulls,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(6), pages 893-397, November.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:6:p:893-397
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:6:p:893-397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.