IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i5p850-856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Birth sex ratio and social rank: consistency and variability within and between primate groups

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriele Schino

Abstract

Variations in birth sex ratios in primates are notoriously inconsistent and have been repeatedly suggested to be mainly owing to stochastic processes. An examination of temporal consistency within primate populations revealed that the effect of dominance rank on birth sex ratio tends to remains stable over time. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of published data on sex ratio variations in primates shows that although no overall effect was detectable, the relation between birth sex ratio and dominance rank was affected by level of resource availability and degree of sexual dimorphism. These results suggest that purely stochastic processes are unlikely to explain observed variations in primate birth sex ratios, and may explain why adaptive sex ratio variations in primates have been so difficult to demonstrate. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriele Schino, 2004. "Birth sex ratio and social rank: consistency and variability within and between primate groups," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(5), pages 850-856, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:850-856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh094
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joan B Silk & Shirley C Strum, 2010. "Maternal Condition Does Not Influence Birth Sex Ratios in Anubis Baboons (Papio anubis)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-7, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:850-856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.